Child support terminiation for William Harris, missing adult.

Well, here it is. The Child support termination order for William Harris of Nova Scotia.

It only took six years, more than 23 court applications and  an hour of Warner’s ranting and raving

about how Victor Harrris, the Dad, the victim of fraudulent child support, shouldn’t have applied to terminate

a court order for a missing adult.

Go figure!

11.03.28 Warner’s Order

What the corrupt courts don’t want you to know!

1. Paulette Harris committed fraud against Victor Harris for 6 years.
2. The tyrants of NS committed fraud against Victor Harris for 6 years and more.
3. William Harris remains unaccountable and inaccessible.
4. Philip and Emily Harris remain unaccountable and inaccessible.
5. Warner ranted and raved for over an hour justifying his and the other judges’ fraud.

Connie Brauer

familyjustice@eastlink.ca

Have you paid child support for an adult?

New Crime Bill Doesn’t Help Victims

Dear Editor,

The new crime bill seeks to punish criminals, however, if the police don’t charge perpetrators with a crime how does this help the victims?

I was assaulted in ’07 by Paulette Raymond in Halifax. I called police and they wouldn’t arrest her citing it was a civil matter. Since when is assault a civil matter?

The HRP suggested I prosecute her myself in court. I did.

Despite eyewitness testimony, pictures of the injury and the her lawyer admitting the assault, she was acquitted. Why? She should have received a 5 year prison sentence.

What’s going on behind the scenes?

She was obviously guilty of a vicious assault. Did they not have room at the jail?

Is the over crowding allowing guilty people of vicious crimes to be acquitted? What’s going on? Where is the justice for victims?

Connie Brauer

Victim of vicious assault

Couple Files Canadian Judicial Corruption and Cover-up Complaint at the United Nations

Couple Files Canadian Judicial Corruption

and Cover-up Complaint  at the United Nations

Media Release, for immediate release

Connie Brauer and Victor Harris

1061 Mines Rd.

RR2

Falmouth, NS B0P 1L0

Canada

Phone and Fax:  902.798.5267

Email: cbrauer@eastlink.ca

http://www.stopthetorture.info

Thursday, October 06, 2011

Couple Files Canadian Judicial Corruption

and Cover-up Complaint Filed at the United Nations

Connie Brauer and Victor Harris, Falmouth, NS Canada, have filed a complaint of multiple, unending crimes, torture and abuse, judicial corruption and cover-up in Canada’s courts with the United Nations.

On Oct. 3, 2011 nearly a year after filing a Leave to Appeal in the Supreme Court of Canada, Victor Harris received the decision of the court as dismissed.

Mr. Harris had been paying child support to Paulette (Harris) Raymond, by order of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, for six years for a missing adult son. Since 2005, when William Harris, the son, reached the age of majority, he has had no contact and no information regarding his son.

Mr. Harris does not know if William Harris is dead or alive. All three of his adult children’s whereabouts are unknown.

Despite repeated efforts, court applications and appeals, the courts refused to terminate child support for a missing adult man. All judges knew that the man was missing. After six years of collecting fraudulent child support, Paulette Raymond terminated her child support payable and Mr. Harris’s child support without any proof of change of circumstances, disclosure or application to the court.

During that time, Paulette Raymond, a Halifax school teacher, committed assault against Connie Brauer. She continued to commit fraud, theft, extortion, parental alienation and withheld all evidence and access to the missing man, from Victor Harris, the father.

The judges relied on fraudulent documents, fraudulent procedures, secret documents and false allegations to unlawfully continue child support for the personal enrichment of Paulette Raymond.

No child support was ever paid to William Harris, by Paulette Raymond as stipulated in the court orders. There is no child. He is a man.

In 2007, Chief Justice Joseph Kennedy ordered Mr. Harris to pay $10,000 in surety costs to the courts before he or anyone else would hear the case to terminated child support for a missing adult man.

This is extortion and it ensured that Mr. Harris would be forced to pay child support for the rest of his life to Ms. Raymond for a missing adult man.

Mr. Harris is a retired teacher, living on a fixed pension income. He has taught thousands of high school children for thirty three years. He was an extraordinary teacher.

He has been denied all parental rights and freedoms, contrary to the court orders and the law allowing for maximum contact.  Mr. Harris and Ms. Brauer have had to file 23 court applications with the court to terminate child support for a missing adult man. That doesn’t take into consideration all the previous applications to vary child support for the other two adults.

Not one judge terminated the fraudulent child support.

The Nova Scotia Supreme Court  judges committed fraud, extortion, theft, abuse, torture, parental alienation, slavery, discrimination, cover up of corruption, hate crime, elder abuse and an unconstitutional violation of Mr. Harris’s GUARANTEED Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Brauer and Harris are determined activists for their parental rights and the rights of all parents in Canada who have been abused and tortured by the discriminatory family law system.

We will not stop until we get compensation, restitution, reform and all perpetrators are prosecuted.

More info at http://www.stopthetorture.info

Connie Brauer and Victor Harris

Paulette Raymond commits Fraud, Extortion and Theft!

Paulette Raymond wants to commit crimes and doesn’t want anyone to know.

NS Canada

Paulette Raymond filed a response to our Leave to Appeal in Supreme Court of Canada on July 22/11.

Here’s the story.

Victor Harris has filed an Appeal from the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia Appeals Court in Jan./11.

The NS court:

1. Denied termination of child support for a missing adult man. Parents ordered to pay for his private apartment in 2005.
2. Missing since 2006.
3. William Harris has been a legal adult since 2005.
4. His Dad has been paying child support to Paulette Harris-Raymond since 2005 until July 2010 when she, not the judges, terminated child support without a written court order.
5. Denied termination of irrevocable life insurance beneficiary as the child. It goes to the child who is no longer a child for child support which is no longer being paid. Get it?
6. Denied the criminal charges against Paulette Harris – Raymond and the Government of Canada for fraud, theft, extortion and numerous other crimes they  committed against Victor Harris.
7. Denied restitution.
8. Denied reform in the Divorce Industry.
9. Denied all accountability.

This necessitated the need to file an Appeal with the Supreme Court of Canada, in Ottawa.

Not one judge among many,  would terminate child support for a missing adult man for the last six years.

They are:

1. Justice Gregory Warner-fraud, theft
2. Justice Gregory Warner-fraud, theft
3. Justice MacDonald, Bateman, and Hamilton- fraud, theft
4. Justice Glen McDougall- fraud, theft
5. Justice John D. Murphy- fraud, theft
6. Justice Gordon Tidman- fraud, theft
7. Chief Justice Joseph Kennedy- fraud, theft and a new one. Extortion of $10,000.
8. Justice Michael MacDonald- fraud, theft, extortion
9. Justice Gregory Warner- fraud, theft, extortion
10. Justice Haliburton- fraud, theft, extortion
11. Justice Jamie Saunders- refused substitution of service and advised the fraud to continue.
12. Justice McDonald- fraud, theft, extortion
13. Justice Farrar, Hamilton and Oland- fraud, theft, extortion
14. Justice Warner- fraud, theft, extortion

Why extortion? Because Kennedy ordered Victor Harris to pay $10,000 to the courts before he or anyone else would terminate child support for a missing adult man, Missing for many years at this time. Each judge after that was implicit in committing extortion.   No accountability for Paulette Harris Raymond or the judges. She’s the one who asked via secret documents to the judge for a surety of $10K  so she can continue to collect fraudulent child support for a missing adult man.

Now in March, 2011 (Five months after the hearing )  Justice Warner called back both parties and provided a written court order terminating child support and releasing the irrevocable beneficiary to be one of Victor Harris’s choice. Be clear however, he did not terminate child support. No one did. Not one judge! What does that tell you? How do you spell  C O R R U P T I O N ?

So now, after seven months during which time Paulette Harris:

1. Changed her name. She wants to be known as Raymond.
2. Refused service.
3. Lied to Canada Post and told them she had moved. Sounds like a crime to me.
4. Asked Supreme Court of Canada to resend the documents that she refused.
5. Asked Supreme Court of Canada for an extension of time.
6. Filed an incomplete and duplicate Factum used in the NS Appeal Court.
7. Filed a suit against Connie Brauer in NS Supreme Court.
8. Asked the Supreme Court of Canada to hold off, until the verdict of the NS Supreme Court against Connie Brauer, in order to influence the outcome of the Supreme Court of Canada.
9. NS Supreme Court dismissed case against Connie Brauer. One point for Warner.
10. Asked the Supreme Court of Canada for another extension of time.
11. Was given an extra 10 days to file.
12. Finally filed her response without addressing any of the issues in the application to the Supreme Court of Canada.
13. Instead she made false allegations, threats and raged on about the media submissions by Connie Brauer.

Well folks, I’m Connie Brauer and I will write submissions to the media about injustice, fraud, extortion, theft, disrespect, assault, withholding access to the adult children, withholding Interrogatories, (written discovery) parental alienation, lies, torture, slavery, violations of the Charter of Rights and more for as long as I want. I have the absolute right to do so.

FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS.

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

(a) freedom of conscience and religion;

(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;

(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and

(d) freedom of association.

So now we wait on the Supreme Court of Canada for Justice.

Connie Brauer, wife of Victor Harris

Paulette Raymond commits fraud, extortion, theft…

Paulette Raymond and Judges commit fraud, extortion and theft!

 

Sign in our front yard. You would be amazed at how much traffic we get.

Paulette Harris – Raymond and multiple Nova Scotia judges have committed fraud, theft, extortion, discrimination and more by withholding all information regarding the whereabouts of missing adult son, William Joseph Harris, Emily Mae Harris and Philip Edward Harris. The judges charged father Victor Harris fraudulent child support for six years since 2005. All money went to Paulette Harris- Raymond without any accountability. No information was disclosed to Dad. No Interrogatories were completed by Paulette Raymond. No adult children have come forth and done the right thing.

 

This is a criminal act of extreme fraud and extortion by Paulette Raymond and her entire family and multiple Supreme Court and Appeals Court Nova Scotia Judges against Victor Harris and Connie Brauer.

Judges have committed the following criminal acts against Victor Harris and Connie Brauer:

 

Allowed Assault (judge acquitted a guilty Paulette Harris-Raymond) ,
Committed fraud, theft, extortion for $10,000, obstructing justice, torture, libel, slander, conspiracy, discrimination,
hate crimes and parental alienation.
Violations of the: divorce act, income tax act, Guaranteed Canadian Charter of Rights and the
United Nations Universal Human Rights.

Paulette Harris Raymond committed assault against Connie Brauer.
She committed fraud, extortion for $10,000, theft over $5,000, slander, parental alienation, withholding access to and information
pertaining to  the whereabouts of the adult children while collecting fraudulent child support, fabricating evidence, disobeying a court order,
refusing to complete Interrogatories, conspiracy, threats and a hate crime against Victor Harris the father.

Child support for a missing adult man, has gone on for six years. She then asked the court to stop  collecting it without any evidence of anything
having changed with the missing man.

We have filed in Supreme Court of Canada for restitution. We want criminal charges laid against Paulette Harris and the Government of Canada and
the Nova Scotia judges.

 

 

 

What is your party doing to stop corruption in Family Law in Canada?

2011 Federal Candidate Questionnaire

on Equal Parenting & Family Law reform

If you have time for only one question, do #1 & e-mail to ccc@coparent.ca

(feel free to attach other sheet to answer “other opinion” or expand your answer, & fax back)

 

Candidate: ______________________

Riding: _______________ Party: _________

1. None of the 48 recommended changes of the  1998 Joint Senate-Commons committee on child custody and access has been implemented in law. Parents had written their own bill implementing equal parenting, designated  C-422 in the last Parliament, but it died with the election. If elected, are you willing to commit to implementing these long awaited changes to the federal divorce act?

__Yes, ___

__No, ____

 

1. The 1998 Joint Senate-Commons committee on child custody and access recommended that Divorce law be reformed to move to the term “shared parenting” Do you support reforming law and practice so children in separating families could have more likelihood of benefiting from shared parenting?

__Yes, shared parenting benefits society, too

__No, I prefer sole custody and primary care-giver doctrine.

Other opinion:___________

 

 

 

3. False Accusations: Non-custodial parents (primarily fathers) complain that false accusations, often in custody, access or divorce conflicts, are used in courts to bias cases against them, drain their assets and stereotype them to the profit of the legal system. Should lawyers be held criminally responsible for any demonstrably false accusation, or one which the lawyer ought to know to be false?

__ Yes, personally abusive or offensive tactics and false accusations as negotiating interfere with the orderly administration of justice and have no place in our legal system.

__ No, I support the current system where any falsely person can spend millions pursuing a claim through the Courts to try to clear his name.

Other opinion:___________

 

 

4 Access Enforcement: Divorced parents often complain that court orders giving them access to their children are violated and not enforced. Should government and courts be required to enforce rulings on access?

__Yes, otherwise the courts will be brought into disrepute, making a lawless society.

__ No, the custodial parent should have sole power to decide if and when children see the other parent.

Other opinion: _____________

 

5. Justice Department Consultation: Justice Canada’s consultation policy gives special access to two lobby groups: the legal profession and ideologically selected women’s organizations. Should consultations be opened to all groups?

__ Yes, these two groups have vested interests in the current adversarial system and preserving their income from governments and divorcing parents, so we need more diverse voices, particularly parents in family law matters.

__ No, lawyers’ organizations and feminists can select laws, judges and regulations that the rest of us have to obey.

Other opinion:___________

 

 

 

 

6. The federal government’s Child Support Guidelines are based on a standard of living equalization formula developed by radical feminists, which assumes child care by only one parent, and is based on only one person’s income. Do you agree with this approach?

__ Yes, it makes it simple for judges to order sole custody & includes needed spousal support.

__ No, it is not fair for shared parenting, or if incomes are very different.

Other opinion:___________

 

 

 

7. After the Supreme Court ruled that the deduction-inclusion system was fairer for the majority of women, children and parents, then Finance Minister Paul Martin changed the system for child support to be tax-free to the recipient. Do you agree with this change?

__Yes, Martin’s approach benefits higher income women and gives the government up to a billion dollars more in higher taxes.

__No, the previous system benefited lower income separated parents and parents kept more money to invest in their children.

Other opinion:___________

8.   In 2003 (Then) Justice Minister Cauchon stated that parents have no rights in relation to their children – only obligations.  Do you agree that parents have no rights, only responsibilities?

__  Yes, parents should have no more rights to their children than any member of the public, or convicted child molester.

__  No, parents need a balance of rights and responsibilities  to raise children in Canada.

__  Other opinion: ______________

 

 

9. Bias in Family Courts: separated fathers complain that they pay higher support amounts than women in the same circumstances, are discriminated against in custody and access judgments and often have to pay the legal fees for the other side. Do you agree that this is a problem and that court practice needs to be reformed?

__Yes, this bias, shown in every objective study, can corrupt civil and criminal law so that Canadians don’t respect the legal system.

__ No. Bias, if any, is simply compensation for thousands of years of male-dominated judiciary

Other opinion:___________

 

 

10. Should support be limited? Judges have  support amounts (child + spousal) higher than the payor’s income, resulting in destroyed businesses, ruined careers and suicides. Should support be limited or related to actual income?

__Yes,  a destroyed or suicidal parent is of no support to his child.

__No, judges should continue to attribute income to fathers they don’t like, to benefit women they have sympathy for.

Other opinion:___________

 

 

11. Do you agree: Separated parents should have the same support obligations to adult children as married parents. (Currently only separated, non-custodial parents are forced to support “children” as old as 28)

__ Yes, as there is no assurance that the money actually goes to benefit the adult child.

__ No, I support the current law & practice which takes money from the NC parent to benefit the CP (custodial parent).

Other opinion:

 

12. Female Parents get preferential treatment in the Income Tax Act, parental leave, Canada Pension Plan and many other laws.  Do you agree that mothers and fathers should be equal in all federal laws and regulations?

__Yes, we give women equality in the workplace, so we should give men equality in  the home.

__ No, I agree with the current approach, as any government assistance to fathers might reduce the amounts available to mothers.

Other opinion: _____________

 

 

 

13. Justice Canada has published “spousal support guidelines” recommending their use by judges, although these have never been reviewed by Parliament or the public. Do you agree with this approach to regulating courts?

__Yes, one or two law professors can produce better results than democratically elected politicians.

__ No, this sets a dangerous, un-democratic precedent.

__  Other opinion:

 

 

 

14. In the Same Sex Marriage bill (2005) the terms mother and father in federal legislation were replaced with, “legal parent”, a change giving power to judges and bureaucrats to remove or suspend traditional natural parent rights. Do you agree with the “legal parent” change?

__Yes, I agree with Justice Canada that eliminating parent rights is necessary for same sex equality.

__ No, natural parents need a balance of rights and responsibilities to raise Canada’s children.

__  Other opinion:

 

 

 

 

Please complete and return this questionnaire to:

Family Forum Fax: (613) 260-0401 Or mail:

631 Tubman, Ottawa, Ontario K1V 8L5

(or you can get this questionnaire as a word file by request at ccc@coparent.ca
Family Forum Questionnaire

c/o 631 Tubman

Ottawa K1V 8L5

 

 

__._,_.___

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional  Family Justice Questionnaire.

Please return  answers  to:

Connie Brauer and Victor Harris

RR2

1061 Mines Rd.

Falmouth, NS B0P 1L0

Canada

Phone and Fax :  902.798.5267

Email: cbrauer@eastlink.ca

http://www.stopthetorture.info

 

Candidate________________________ Party_______________________________________

What is your party doing to:

 

1. End the abuse, incompetence, discrimination and slavery  by Canadian judges against non custodial families? Systematic destruction to families.

 

 

 

1. What is your party doing to ensure the GUARANTEED Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms are upheld and ENFORCED by judges? There is no Charter. No judges will uphold it.

 

 

 

1. What is your party doing to end the fraudulent child support, theft and extortion of missing, adult children by the judges? Fraud, theft, extortion and parental alienation is rampant in our courts.

 

1. What is your party doing to end discrimination and abuse of parents and children by sole custody parents and their biased judges? Judges always support the custodial parent and criminalize the non custodial parent.

 

 

 

 

1. What is your party doing to stop the human trafficking of babies and children by judges who automatically award permanent custody to Children’s Aid Societies who apply for apprehension orders based on no threat or evidence of physical harm? Saw this with my own eyes!

 

If you think this isn’t happening in our country, you are not informed. These Crimes Against Humanity are being practiced every day, in every court in Canada. Who speaks for Canadian families? This could happen to your family.

 

 

 

 

Take it from one who has been there.

 

Connie Brauer and Victor Harris

RR2

1061 Mines Rd.

Falmouth, NS B0P 1L0

Canada

Phone and Fax :  902.798.5267

Email: cbrauer@eastlink.ca

http://www.stopthetorture.info